Archive for the ‘ mortgage ’ Category

California Enacts Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief

SACRAMENTO, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– A new state law allows taxpayers to immediately exclude from their income the amount of mortgage debt on their home loan that has been forgiven by their lender. The law largely brings California statutes into conformity with current federal law. Previously, California conformed to federal debt relief only for 2007 and 2008, according to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB).

“California has been particularly hard hit by the housing crisis,” said State Controller and FTB Chair John Chiang. “This is a critical tax change that will help people in our state who already are suffering the loss of their homes.”

The new law, SB 401 (Wolk), allows most taxpayers to exclude canceled mortgage debt income of up to $500,000 on their principal residence. The limit is $250,000 for married/registered domestic partner (RDP) individuals filing separately. It applies to debt forgiveness in 2009 through 2012 resulting from a foreclosure, “short sale,” or loan modification of a taxpayer’s qualified personal residence.

Prior to the law’s passage, these amounts were taxable to California. If you owe a debt to someone else and they cancel or forgive that debt, the canceled amount often is taxable. These amounts are generally reported on a 1099-C and are provided to both the taxpayer and the government. Debt forgiveness on other types of debt, such as a second home or business property, does not qualify for exclusion under the new law.

The law largely brings California into conformity with the federal Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act for discharges that occurred in tax years 2007 through 2012. However, California’s limits of qualifying principal residence indebtedness differ from federal limits.

Qualifying taxpayers who have already filed their 2009 tax returns should file Form 540X, Amended Individual Income Tax Return, to subtract the amount of debt relief from income. To expedite processing, write “Mortgage Debt Relief” in red across the top of the amended tax return. Taxpayers must attach a copy of their federal return, including Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness (and Section 1082 Basis Adjustment), with their state tax return.

Like federal law, the new state law allows individuals and businesses to exempt energy grants that are provided in lieu of federal energy credits from their gross income and alternative minimum taxable income. It also conforms California law to many other federal provisions.

According to FTB estimates, approximately 100,000 people may benefit from mortgage debt relief for tax years 2009-2012. For more information, taxpayers are urged to visit FTB’s website at www.ftb.ca.gov.

For more information on other taxes and fees in California, visit: taxes.ca.gov

Bank of America to Reduce Mortgage Balances

By DAVID STREITFELD and LOUISE STORY

Bank of America, under pressure to keep distressed borrowers from losing their homes, said Wednesday that it would begin forgiving some of their mortgage debt.

While limited in scope and by invitation-only, the program is a significant shift in efforts to assist the four million homeowners who are facing foreclosure. It comes as banks and the Treasury Department are under growing pressure from the Obama administration, lawmakers and community groups to stem the foreclosure tide.

With the housing market entering another period of stress, worries about foreclosure are compounded. As the volume of sales drops, prices start to slide as well. When the gap keeps increasing between the size of a mortgage and the value that the home could fetch from a buyer, owners tend to give up.

“Banks are willing to take some losses now to avoid much greater losses later if the housing market continues to spiral, and that’s a sea change from where they were a year ago,” said Howard Glaser, a housing consultant in Washington and a former H.U.D. official.

The Bank of America program is intended for owners who received loans from Countrywide Financial, the biggest and one of the most aggressive lenders during the housing boom. Bank of America bought Countrywide in 2008.

Bank of America executives said the program would work this way: A borrower owes $250,000 on a house now worth $200,000. Fifty thousand dollars of that balance would be moved into a special interest-free account.

As long as the owner continued to make payments on the $200,000, every year $10,000 in the special account would be forgiven until either the balance was zero or the housing market recovered and the borrower once again had positive equity.

“The time has come to test this sort of program,” Jack W. Schakett, who heads credit loss mitigation strategies at Bank of America, said in a briefing. “Modifications are better than foreclosure.”

That was the original notion behind the government’s modification program, which was originally touted as helping millions of borrowers but has resulted in permanently improved loans for less than 200,000. The program, which stresses reductions in interest rates, was criticized Wednesday by the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program for over-promising and under-delivering.

Homebuyer Tax Credit -Part II

The $8,000 homebuyer tax credit has been extended into 2010, and an additional $6,500 tax credit for “move up” buyers has been added. Here are some additional features of the program to keep in mind:

Qualified first-time homebuyers can continue to receive the $8,000 tax credit. A new, move up buyer tax credit of $6,500 has been added for qualified homeowners who have lived in their homes for at least consecutive five years.

This program begins on Dec. 1, 2009. Buyers in both groups must sign a purchase agreement by April 30, 2010, and close by June 30, 2010. Income levels have been raised which is great news: Homebuyers with incomes up to $125,000 for single filers and $225,000 for joint filers now qualify.

In addition, Los Angeles residents will be pleased to know the increased maximum conforming loan amount of $729,750 has been extended through the end of 2010, making jumbo lending more affordable and easier to obtain.

New Laws to Combat Mortgage Fraud in California

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger approved seven new laws yesterday that aim to protect Califonia homeowners and homebuyers from mortgage fraud. While this is definitely a step in the right direction, I can’t help but wish these laws were in effect years ago. At any rate, this is what the laws are supposed to do: 

• Strengthen California’s reverse mortgage laws by providing senior homeowners with greater consumer protections when considering reverse mortgage agreements,

 • Make it a felony to commit fraud in connection with a mortgage application.

 • Promote responsibility and accountability in the real estate market.

 “Fraudulent mortgage practices have become more prevalent as a result of the national foreclosure crisis that negatively impacted California’s housing market and economy,” says Mr. Schwarzenegger. “This legislation helps crack down on abusive lending practices by giving law enforcement the tools to effectively investigate mortgage fraud crimes and provides Californians with greater consumer protections to promote homeownership in a safe and accountable environment.”

 Specifically, the bills signed are:

 • AB260 by Assemblyman Ted Lieu, D-Torrance will enact the Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Law which would codify a fiduciary duty for mortgage brokers, authorize California’s mortgage regulators to apply specified federal mortgage lending laws and regulations to their licensees and cap prepayment penalties and yield spread premiums on higher-priced loans.

 SB 36 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montebello to establish standardized licensing requirements for all individual loan originators who offer or negotiate residential mortgages.

 • SB 239 by Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Santa Monica to make it a felony to commit fraud in connection with a mortgage application. This bill makes individuals who engage in mortgage fraud guilty of a public offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail up to one year. The bill also provides law enforcement with the necessary tools to make it easier to obtain a search warrant for real estate records and documents believed to contain evidence of mortgage fraud.

 • AB 329 by Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles to establish the Reverse Mortgage Elder Protection Act of 2009 to provide senior homeowners with greater consumer protections to ensure that they are fully informed about the consequences of entering into a reverse mortgage agreement. Specifically, the bill requires lenders to provide prospective borrowers with a clear and informative written disclosure statement and a written checklist pertaining to the risks and suitability of a reverse mortgage, prior to borrower attending loan counseling.

 • SB 237 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montebello to create a registration program for appraisal management companies (AMCs) and prohibits any person or entity from acting in the capacity of an AMC without first obtaining a certificate for registration from the Office of Real Estate Appraisers.

 • AB 957 by Assemblywoman Cathleen Galgiani, D-Livingston to mandate that buyers of foreclosed homes would have the choice of using a local escrow office to handle the transaction. It also prohibits a seller of residential property from requiring the buyer to use an escrow service company or purchase title insurance chosen by the seller and would also prohibit a seller of residential property from, without good cause, disapproving the use of a title or escrow company chosen by the buyer.

 • AB 1160 by Assemblyman Paul Fong, D-Cupertino to require mortgage loan documents to be translated into the language the verbal negotiations were conducted. Mortgage documents would be translated into Spanish, Chinese, Tagalong, Korean and Vietnamese languages.

10 questions borrowers should ask their lender

By Jack Guttentag, Inman News

Locking the price of a mortgage is full of potential problems for the unwary borrower. Locking is especially problematic in today’s market because prices can jump around from day to day, and lenders take much longer than in pre-crisis years to approve an application, and often can’t.

Locking means that the lender commits that the price at closing will be the lock price, even if the market price is higher at closing than it was on the lock date. The price commitment holds for a specified period, usually 30 to 90 days, with longer periods priced higher. Whether the borrower is equally committed if the price at closing is lower depends on the lender’s policy, see below.

Last year I wrote an article on one approach a borrower could take to avoid lock problems, which is to entrust the process to a mortgage broker who knows exactly what the problems are. The drawback is the difficulty of assuring that the broker will use his knowledge for the benefit of the borrower rather than himself.

This article is about how borrowers can protect themselves when they deal directly with lenders. The key is in knowing the lender’s locking rules and procedures beforehand. This is not easy because very few volunteer the information; the borrower must ask.

Upfront Mortgage Lenders (UMLs) are an exception because one of my requirements for certification is that they show their lock policies on their Web sites. In reviewing these policies recently, however, I found wide discrepancies in completeness, which is my fault; my disclosure rules were too vague. This is being remedied, and very shortly the UMLs will have revised lock statements that are responsive to the questions listed below.

What Must Happen Before the Price Can Be Locked? In most cases, the lender will require that a purchaser have a contract of sale, and that the loan application has been approved. Because approvals now often take longer than before the crisis, this immediately raises the two questions that follow.

What Happens If The Market Price Rises Before The Application Can Be Approved and the Loan Locked? Generally, the lender will be willing to lock only at the new higher price. (If there are any lenders who will lock at the price prevailing at the time of the lock request, I don’t know who they are.) This is a common occurrence, and a major source of frustration for borrowers, some of whom think they have been victimized by a “bait and switch.” Actually, they have been victimized by price volatility and delays in getting loans approved, but because lenders seldom warn borrowers that this can happen, the borrower’s misinterpretation is natural.

What Happens If The Market Price Falls Before The Application Can Be Approved and the Loan Locked? A lender who locks at the current price when that price is higher than the one prevailing on the lock request date should do the same when the current price is lower. My guess, however, is that in many cases, lenders lock at the higher price on the lock request date, just because they can. Borrowers are unlikely to object if they are locked at the price they requested. It is ironic that borrowers perceive themselves as victimized most often when prices rise after the lock request, but probably they are victimized most often when prices decline.

What is covered by a lock? Many lenders lock only the interest rate and points. Locks should cover the rate, points and all other lender fees, avoiding the possibility of fee escalation after the lock. This is the case with UMLs. A few lenders will not only lock all lender fees but also some third-party fees.

What fees must a borrower pay to lock? Lenders usually charge from $300 to $600 to lock, which they may call an application fee, appraisal fee or something else.

Under what circumstances are fees refunded? Refund policies vary widely. If the lender is unable to lock the requested price, either because the borrower can’t be approved or because the market has changed, any fees not paid to third parties in connection with the application should be refunded.

What happens if the market price drops after the loan is locked? In most cases, nothing happens because the lender presumes that both parties are committed by the lock. Some lenders, recognizing that some borrowers may cancel the deal to begin again within another lender, offer a “float-down.” This allows for a drop in the rate, but not all the way to the new market rate. Lenders offering float-downs should spell out in their lock policies exactly how they work.

What happens if the borrower wants to change the type of mortgage (or the rate/point combination) after the price is locked? Most lenders will allow such changes, but only at the higher of the lock prices or the current prices. That makes it important for borrowers to know exactly what they want before they request a lock.

What happens if the loan cannot be closed within the lock period? If the delay is the lender’s fault, the lock period should be extended at no cost to the borrower. If the delay is the borrower’s fault, the lender will charge the borrower for a lock extension. These charges should be spelled out in the lender’s lock policy.

In the event of delay, what would constitute borrower fault? This would include not providing requested documentation promptly, delaying appraisal inspections, and not obtaining a subordination agreement from the second mortgage lender if there is one. Lenders can minimize this obvious source of conflict by spelling out the borrower’s obligation in detail in the lock agreement.

The writer is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Comments and questions can be left at www.mtgprofessor.com.

Interest-Only Loans: Another Time Bomb?

From David Streitfeld at the NY Times: The House Trap

An analysis for The New York Times by the real estate information company First American CoreLogic shows there are 2.8 million active interest-only home loans worth a combined total of $908 billion.

The interest-only periods, which put off the principal payments for five, seven or 10 years, are now beginning to expire. In the next 12 months, $71 billion of interest-only loans will reset. The year after, another $100 billion will reset. After mid-2011, another $400 billion will reset.

There are a several fascinating anecdotes in the article, including a professor who teaches real estate finance. Here is one:

“I understand I took a risk,” said [Dean Janis, a Southern California lawyer who bought a $950,000 home in 2004] “But I did not anticipate that the real estate market would go down 30 percent.” He talked with Wells Fargo about his options, and the lender said he had none.

 

Top Wholesale Reverse Mortgage Lenders

I have included a list from a recent article from the Reverse Mortgage Daily that lists the top 10 wholesale reverse mortgage lenders for the past year. I’ve heard from more than one mortgage pro that reverse mortgages may eventually go the way of the subprime loan. The idea here is with the current amount of baby boomers reaching retirement age , combined with declining home equity, lenders will have to tighten underwriting standards, thus lowering payments to homeowners to reflect the risks.

PennyMac REIT Raises Funds to Buy Distressed Mortgages

For those of  you who are investment-savvy, here is an IPO you may want to keep your eye on. Penny Mack Mortgage Investment Trust plans to trade on the NYSE under the symbol PMT.  The company plans to acquire distressed mortgage loans and, through a network of special servicing expertise, rehabilitate them into sustainable performing loans. You can read more here .

House Bill Extends Higher Loan Limits

The House Appropriations Committee has approved an extension of the $729,750 loan limits for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration through September 2010. The committee also increased the lending and guarantee authority of FHA and Ginnie Mae, as requested by the Obama Administration. The Department of Housing and Urban Development appropriations bill authorizes FHA to insure $400 billion in single-family loans during fiscal year 2010, up from $315 billion in the current 2009 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. The FY 2010 appropriations bill allows Ginnie Mae to guarantee up to $500 billion in securities backed by single-family and multifamily loans. Congress provided the secondary market agency with $400 billion in MBS guarantee authority in the FY 2009 appropriations bill. The massive stimulus bill that President Barack Obama signed in February raised the maximum loan limit for the GSEs and FHA to $729,750. But the higher limit is due to expire at year-end, if the full House as well as the Senate does not approve this bill.

Pros and Cons of a Bi-Weekly Payment Program

 When a borrower enters into a contract to make bi-weekly payments on their mortgage, the amortization schedule is accelerated. For example, with a 30-year amortization schedule, the borrower makes 12 payments per year. In a bi-weekly arrangement, the borrower makes 26 ‘half’ payments, which allows the loan to be paid off in 22.8 years instead of 30 years. It’s the same as making 13 monthly payments. This ultimately saves the borrower thousands of dollars in interest rate fees. However, bear in mind that bi-weekly programs usually have some type of setup, transaction, and maintenance fees associated with them. A custodian manages the bi-weekly payments in a trust account (and also makes a profit on the interest accrued there). Because the lender really doesn’t accept partial payments, this middle man is still making monthly payments to the lender on some type of pre-payment schedule. It is important for the consumer to know that the same results can be achieved without hiring an outside company to do this. As long as your loan program carries no pre-payment penalty, pre-payments can be made on a monthly or annual basis to shorten the loan term to save money on interest or remove PMI charges on loans that have less than a 20% down payment. The borrower simply needs to indicate the extra payment is being made toward the principal balance, and have the discipline to make these extra payments as scheduled.

Courtesy of  Arcstone Financial