Archive for October, 2009

Senators agree to extend homebuyer tax credit

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER (AP)

 WASHINGTON — Senators have agreed to extend a popular tax credit for first-time homebuyers and to offer a reduced credit to some repeat buyers.

The tax credit provides up to $8,000 to first-time homebuyers but is set to expire at the end of November. A spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said senators agreed Wednesday to extend the existing tax credit for first-time homebuyers while offering a reduced credit of up to $6,500 to repeat buyers who have owned their current homes for at least five years.

A congressional aide said the tax credits would be available to homebuyers who sign sales agreements by the end of April. They would have until the end of June to close on their new homes. The aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity, was not authorized to publicly discuss the deal.

Fewer People Bailing on California, Los Angeles

According to recent data from Relocation.com, the number of people leaving the state is shrinking compared to the number of people moving to it, a crucial gauge for measuring the state’s rebound from economic calamity.

 As recently as 2005, 60.7% of the relocation activity was outbound– in other words, for every 2 people who were moving, 3 were leaving.

That kind of migration can decimate the local tax base and contribute to a further erosion in the state’s quality of life. However, that outbound number has been slowly decreasing every year, from 58.6% in 2006 to 54.99% in 2009 year to date. These numbers are reflected in the Los Angeles data.

We looked at the data for all moves in Los Angeles, including moves made within Los Angeles. We found that outbound Los Angeles moves accounted for 36.4% of all moves in 2009 year to date, down from 43.1% in 2008 (the earliest year for which city data are available).

However, instead of people moving to Los Angeles, we found that more people were making moves within the Los Angeles area, an indication that more people are taking advantage of housing prices to either ‘move up’ to a better home, or move to a better neighborhood.

Most importantly, of course, they’re deciding not to move out of Los Angeles.

The percentage of movers making a move within LA was 25.2% in 2008; it rose to 32.33% in 2009.

Relocation.com utilizes real-time data from people requesting moving services, recording where people are moving from and to. It annually records over 500,000 moving requests in its database.

Congress Healthcare: HR 615

 
On Tuesday, the Senate health committee voted 12-11 in favor of a two-page amendment, courtesy of Republican Tom Coburn which would require all Members of Congress and their staff members to enroll in any new government-run health plan.

Congressman John Fleming has proposed an amendment that would require Congressmen and Senators to take the same health care plan that they would force on us. (Under proposed legislation they are exempt.)

Congressman Fleming is encouraging people to go to his Website and sign his petition. Please be patient though, as this website has been overwhelmed by responses, and rightly so.

Senator Coburn and Congressman Fleming are both physicians. Regardless of your political beliefs, it seems reasonable that Members of Congress should have exactly the same medical coverage that they impose on the rest of us.

Buyer’s Choice Act Signed Into Law

Legislation Protects Consumers Purchasing Foreclosed Properties

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 13 /PRNewswire/ — The Escrow Institute of California announced today that Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 957 into law. This bill, authored by Assembly Member Cathleen Galgiani (D-Tracy), protects consumers by ensuring that they have the right to choose their own real estate service providers when purchasing foreclosed properties.

AB 957, known as the Buyer’s Choice Act, prohibits sellers of so-called REO properties – typically foreclosed properties owned by banks – from requiring the buyer to use a particular title company, escrow settlement or other real estate service provider. This unethical, anti-competitive practice drives up costs for homebuyers and takes business away from locally owned companies. The problem has become particularly acute in the Central Valley and Inland Empire, areas that have faced some of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Recent data indicate that 11 of the nation’s top 20 foreclosure rates are in California metropolitan areas.

“Homebuyers should have every right to choose their title, escrow and real estate service providers based on price and quality of service,” said Assembly Member Cathleen Galgiani. “AB 957 ensures that buyers can make marketplace choices that suit their own best interests, rather than getting forced to serve the financial interests of some international bank or other corporation.”

The Buyer’s Choice Act enjoyed overwhelming, bi-partisan support in the Legislature, with State Senator Jeff Denham (R-Merced) providing important assistance. AB 957 was sponsored by the Escrow Institute of California, and received support from the California Association of Realtors and numerous real estate professionals from across the state. The bill requires that REO sellers provide a disclosure notice to buyers informing them of their rights to choose their own title, escrow and other real estate services. Sellers who violate the provisions of AB 957 are subject to enforcement action by state regulators and liable to buyers for civil penalties.

“It’s just not right that independent escrow companies and other local real estate businesses are being literally locked out of the foreclosure sales market,” said Escrow Institute of California CEO Tim Egan. “These local companies oftentimes offer the best price and highest quality of service available to consumers. Excluding these companies from REO sales kills local jobs and eliminates competition in the marketplace.”

For additional information regarding AB 957, please visit www.escrowinstitute.org.

New Laws to Combat Mortgage Fraud in California

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger approved seven new laws yesterday that aim to protect Califonia homeowners and homebuyers from mortgage fraud. While this is definitely a step in the right direction, I can’t help but wish these laws were in effect years ago. At any rate, this is what the laws are supposed to do: 

• Strengthen California’s reverse mortgage laws by providing senior homeowners with greater consumer protections when considering reverse mortgage agreements,

 • Make it a felony to commit fraud in connection with a mortgage application.

 • Promote responsibility and accountability in the real estate market.

 “Fraudulent mortgage practices have become more prevalent as a result of the national foreclosure crisis that negatively impacted California’s housing market and economy,” says Mr. Schwarzenegger. “This legislation helps crack down on abusive lending practices by giving law enforcement the tools to effectively investigate mortgage fraud crimes and provides Californians with greater consumer protections to promote homeownership in a safe and accountable environment.”

 Specifically, the bills signed are:

 • AB260 by Assemblyman Ted Lieu, D-Torrance will enact the Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Law which would codify a fiduciary duty for mortgage brokers, authorize California’s mortgage regulators to apply specified federal mortgage lending laws and regulations to their licensees and cap prepayment penalties and yield spread premiums on higher-priced loans.

 SB 36 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montebello to establish standardized licensing requirements for all individual loan originators who offer or negotiate residential mortgages.

 • SB 239 by Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Santa Monica to make it a felony to commit fraud in connection with a mortgage application. This bill makes individuals who engage in mortgage fraud guilty of a public offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail up to one year. The bill also provides law enforcement with the necessary tools to make it easier to obtain a search warrant for real estate records and documents believed to contain evidence of mortgage fraud.

 • AB 329 by Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles to establish the Reverse Mortgage Elder Protection Act of 2009 to provide senior homeowners with greater consumer protections to ensure that they are fully informed about the consequences of entering into a reverse mortgage agreement. Specifically, the bill requires lenders to provide prospective borrowers with a clear and informative written disclosure statement and a written checklist pertaining to the risks and suitability of a reverse mortgage, prior to borrower attending loan counseling.

 • SB 237 by Sen. Ron Calderon, D-Montebello to create a registration program for appraisal management companies (AMCs) and prohibits any person or entity from acting in the capacity of an AMC without first obtaining a certificate for registration from the Office of Real Estate Appraisers.

 • AB 957 by Assemblywoman Cathleen Galgiani, D-Livingston to mandate that buyers of foreclosed homes would have the choice of using a local escrow office to handle the transaction. It also prohibits a seller of residential property from requiring the buyer to use an escrow service company or purchase title insurance chosen by the seller and would also prohibit a seller of residential property from, without good cause, disapproving the use of a title or escrow company chosen by the buyer.

 • AB 1160 by Assemblyman Paul Fong, D-Cupertino to require mortgage loan documents to be translated into the language the verbal negotiations were conducted. Mortgage documents would be translated into Spanish, Chinese, Tagalong, Korean and Vietnamese languages.

U.S. Treasury set to finalize short sales plan

NEW YORK (Reuters)

“Short sales,” or sales of homes for less than the balance on existing mortgages, are seen as a key way to supplement other efforts such as loan modifications to steady housing. 

 Unlike most modifications, “short sales” eliminate the problem of negative equity that has become a big reason for defaults as home prices have plunged.

The incentives, first announced in May, would expand the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program that has seen limited success in lowering payments for hundreds of thousands of homeowners deemed eligible.

Just 12 percent of homeowners eligible have had their loans reworked, leaving millions more foreclosures to come, the Treasury said on September 9.

More short sales may alleviate fears that a raft of “shadow supply,” or foreclosures in the pipeline, will flood the market and deal a blow to the nascent rebound in housing seen over the U.S. summer months, analysts said.

The overhang of supply is currently about 7 million units, or 135 percent of a year’s of existing home sales, according to Amherst Securities Group.

“What they are trying to do is move some of these foreclosures in the pipeline, and bring them to a resolution before (foreclosure) happens,” said Lisa Marquis Jackson, a vice-president at Irvine, California-based John Burns Real Estate Consulting. “12 percent of these being modified isn’t enough to clean these up.”

Realtors express frustrations with banks when trying to negotiate a short sale, which can take four to five months to complete, according to John Burns consultants.

Buyers often walk away from sales because banks are slow to respond, or balk at the offer.

The Treasury will use up to $10 billion from a previously announced $50 billion pool of mortgage modification funds for payments to address lender concerns that home prices will continue falling in high-cost areas.

Incentives will be calculated on recent declines of local home prices and average home prices in these markets, the Treasury said in May. They would add to other incentives that servicers can receive for reducing loan payments.

In May, the Treasury proposed lenders would receive a $1,000 payment for allowing the owner to sell the house for less than the amount owed on the mortgage, and accepting the proceeds as full repayment.

They can also receive $1,000 for accepting a similar deed-in-lieu transaction, in which the deed is simply transferred to the lender instead of going through a costly foreclosure.

Borrowers who agree to short sales or deed-in-lieu deals can received up to $1,500 in closing costs.

Treasury also said it will pay second lien holders up to $1,000 to relinquish their claims in such transactions.

“Presumably, the Treasury is trying to help facilitate a transaction that will result in less loss to the lender than in the case of a foreclosure,” John Burns consultants said in a research note dated Oct 1 alerting clients of an impending Treasury announcement.

Asbestos Prevention and Tips for a Healthy, Green Home

             
Implementing and enforcing the state’s environmental protection laws, The California Environmental Protection Agency ensures clean water, air, soil and waste recycling is performed throughout the state.  This agency is at the forefront of science and research to lead to a cleaner, healthier planet for all.

With a variety of home materials on the market still not banned b the federal government, there has been concern present from citizens regarding asbestos exposure. California is one of many states implementing sustainable methods of construction.

Many Los Angeles real estate agents have begun to understand the many risks and responsibilities involved in the home buying process. Many new homes that are foreclosed may require renovation or repairs, especially in areas susceptible to natural disasters. This process may require inspection for hazardous materials.

The path to owning a home is an exciting time for everyone, but one that will bring additional responsibilities. Utilized in thousands of construction and building applications throughout the 20th century, asbestos was a highly regarded mineral due to its heat resistant properties. Homes or buildings constructed before 1980 may still contain asbestos. Due to a steady progression of technology and green sustainable methods, there are many ways to ensure your home or property is asbestos free.

Healthy Tips

If any asbestos is suspected, the best advice is to leave it un-disturbed. . Sometimes the best action is no action. A home inspector can determine the proper course of action. Asbestos removal in public facilities, homes and workplaces must be undertaken by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor.  The removal of asbestos is a finite process that must be done by a professional. 

 

In most situations, asbestos appears in roof shingles, dry wall, attic insulation, popcorn ceilings, joint compounds and electrical wires. It is not always an easy process to determine whether or not a particular insulation contains asbestos. Anyone who is unsure about the insulation in their home should have the materials in question inspected and tested.

 

The inhlation of airborne asbestos fibers can cause mesothelioma, a severe lung ailment associated with asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma treatment has varied affects on individuals, with many factors impacting a patient’s prognosis. These include age of diagnosis, latency period and age of diagnosis.

 

California Going Green

 

Organizations such as Environment LA also help bring together programs and projects that are helping make Los Angeles become a more sustainable and environmentally friendly city. Environmental stability is on the minds of many citizens throughout the state. The implementation of eco-construction, green energy solutions will play an important role in the transformation to a healthier and sustainable world.

The list of options also includes cellulose and lcynene foam. Cotton fiber is made from recycled batted material and treated to be flame resistant. With the implementation of these recycled materials, waste is also decreasing in landfills. Studies show that the use of recycled building materials can reduce annual energy costs by 25 percent!

With a lackluster economy, these kinds of figures have attracted those who were unaware of eco-friendly construction. Not only will these asbestos alternatives reduce energy costs, they allow a lifestyle that promotes a clean, free of health damaging materials.

 

 Courtesy of the Mesothelioma Center

District Attorney: Beware of Loan Modification Scams

District Attorney Steve Cooley warns Los Angeles County homeowners to be on the alert for foreclosure rescue scams. Many consumers are faced with a mortgage they can no longer afford and are facing foreclosure. Unscrupulous opportunists are profiting from this crisis.  They promise quick results for a fee but actually provide nothing.

Beware of promises involving the payment of substantial amounts of money or the deeding of your home to someone as a way to solve your financial problems.

In reality, these predators may steal your money, your home and your hope.

Help yourself. Call your lender directly to negotiate a loan modification. For foreclosure assistance, seek help from a housing counselor approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by calling 1-888-995-HOPE (4673).

For more information or to make a complaint, contact the Los Angeles County Department of Consumer Affairs Real Estate Fraud and Information Program at 1-800- 973-3370.

If you believe you are a victim of a foreclosure scam, call your local law enforcement agency.

To learn more about foreclosure fraud, go to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s website at:http://da.lacounty.gov/cpd/foreclosure.htm.

To watch a video public service announcement about foreclosure fraud, click here.

10 questions borrowers should ask their lender

By Jack Guttentag, Inman News

Locking the price of a mortgage is full of potential problems for the unwary borrower. Locking is especially problematic in today’s market because prices can jump around from day to day, and lenders take much longer than in pre-crisis years to approve an application, and often can’t.

Locking means that the lender commits that the price at closing will be the lock price, even if the market price is higher at closing than it was on the lock date. The price commitment holds for a specified period, usually 30 to 90 days, with longer periods priced higher. Whether the borrower is equally committed if the price at closing is lower depends on the lender’s policy, see below.

Last year I wrote an article on one approach a borrower could take to avoid lock problems, which is to entrust the process to a mortgage broker who knows exactly what the problems are. The drawback is the difficulty of assuring that the broker will use his knowledge for the benefit of the borrower rather than himself.

This article is about how borrowers can protect themselves when they deal directly with lenders. The key is in knowing the lender’s locking rules and procedures beforehand. This is not easy because very few volunteer the information; the borrower must ask.

Upfront Mortgage Lenders (UMLs) are an exception because one of my requirements for certification is that they show their lock policies on their Web sites. In reviewing these policies recently, however, I found wide discrepancies in completeness, which is my fault; my disclosure rules were too vague. This is being remedied, and very shortly the UMLs will have revised lock statements that are responsive to the questions listed below.

What Must Happen Before the Price Can Be Locked? In most cases, the lender will require that a purchaser have a contract of sale, and that the loan application has been approved. Because approvals now often take longer than before the crisis, this immediately raises the two questions that follow.

What Happens If The Market Price Rises Before The Application Can Be Approved and the Loan Locked? Generally, the lender will be willing to lock only at the new higher price. (If there are any lenders who will lock at the price prevailing at the time of the lock request, I don’t know who they are.) This is a common occurrence, and a major source of frustration for borrowers, some of whom think they have been victimized by a “bait and switch.” Actually, they have been victimized by price volatility and delays in getting loans approved, but because lenders seldom warn borrowers that this can happen, the borrower’s misinterpretation is natural.

What Happens If The Market Price Falls Before The Application Can Be Approved and the Loan Locked? A lender who locks at the current price when that price is higher than the one prevailing on the lock request date should do the same when the current price is lower. My guess, however, is that in many cases, lenders lock at the higher price on the lock request date, just because they can. Borrowers are unlikely to object if they are locked at the price they requested. It is ironic that borrowers perceive themselves as victimized most often when prices rise after the lock request, but probably they are victimized most often when prices decline.

What is covered by a lock? Many lenders lock only the interest rate and points. Locks should cover the rate, points and all other lender fees, avoiding the possibility of fee escalation after the lock. This is the case with UMLs. A few lenders will not only lock all lender fees but also some third-party fees.

What fees must a borrower pay to lock? Lenders usually charge from $300 to $600 to lock, which they may call an application fee, appraisal fee or something else.

Under what circumstances are fees refunded? Refund policies vary widely. If the lender is unable to lock the requested price, either because the borrower can’t be approved or because the market has changed, any fees not paid to third parties in connection with the application should be refunded.

What happens if the market price drops after the loan is locked? In most cases, nothing happens because the lender presumes that both parties are committed by the lock. Some lenders, recognizing that some borrowers may cancel the deal to begin again within another lender, offer a “float-down.” This allows for a drop in the rate, but not all the way to the new market rate. Lenders offering float-downs should spell out in their lock policies exactly how they work.

What happens if the borrower wants to change the type of mortgage (or the rate/point combination) after the price is locked? Most lenders will allow such changes, but only at the higher of the lock prices or the current prices. That makes it important for borrowers to know exactly what they want before they request a lock.

What happens if the loan cannot be closed within the lock period? If the delay is the lender’s fault, the lock period should be extended at no cost to the borrower. If the delay is the borrower’s fault, the lender will charge the borrower for a lock extension. These charges should be spelled out in the lender’s lock policy.

In the event of delay, what would constitute borrower fault? This would include not providing requested documentation promptly, delaying appraisal inspections, and not obtaining a subordination agreement from the second mortgage lender if there is one. Lenders can minimize this obvious source of conflict by spelling out the borrower’s obligation in detail in the lock agreement.

The writer is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Comments and questions can be left at www.mtgprofessor.com.